Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Program evaluation is required by accrediting and regulatory bodies and is critical for sustaining robust, evidence-based improvements at the program level. Still, educators struggle to consistently apply appropriate evaluation frameworks. The inherent complexity and interdependence of curricular components render systematic program evaluation both daunting and labor-intensive. METHOD: This manuscript provides guidance on applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation (MM). The MM emphasizes problem identification, evidence synthesis, and the strategic selection of a program evaluation framework to support curricular improvements in academic nursing programs. RESULTS: The authors provide practical guidance and recommendations based on a nationally recognized initiative that uses this approach. CONCLUSION: As nursing education continues to evolve, the MM offers an accessible, evidence-informed approach that empowers academic nurses to achieve meaningful, sustainable program outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stacy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: