Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: This study validated the Korean version of the PID-5-BF+M (K-PID-5-BF+M), integrating DSM-5 and ICD-11 dimensional models. Method: Data were collected from 800 Korean adults ( M age = 44.79). Two independent confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on split subsamples ( n = 400 each), followed by measurement invariance testing across sex. Results: The six-domain loading pattern was observed across both samples and showed measurement invariance across sex, although overall fit did not reach conventional benchmarks and an intermediate facet-level model did not yield an admissible solution. Domain-level internal consistency was adequate (ω = .70–.84). Convergent validity was partially supported with five-factor model traits, and criterion-related validity was supported through associations with categorical PD symptoms and personality functioning. Limitations: The community-based sample and inadmissible facet-level solutions limit generalizability and support for facet-level interpretation. Conclusion: The K-PID-5-BF+M appears to provide adequate reliability and validity for domain-level screening of maladaptive personality traits in Korean adults, although some items and facets deviate from the original structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
JANG et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: