Key result
The 7F Radical guide catheter achieves distal ICA access in ~69% of cases.
Why the study?
Most neurointerventional guide catheters have distinct transition points in their mechanical properties that may hinder advancement into the cerebrovasculature, and first-in-human data were needed for the 7F Radical guide catheter, which uses a polymer jacket for a continuous transition of mechanical properties.
Does the 7F Radical guide catheter safely and effectively establish distal cerebrovascular access in patients undergoing neurointervention?
Observational (n=154)
Blinded image assessment
Yes
Does the 7F Radical guide catheter safely and effectively establish distal cerebrovascular access in patients undergoing neurointervention?
First-in-human multicenter data demonstrate that the 7F Radical guide catheter safely achieves distal cerebrovascular access and allows for a simplified biaxial system in the majority of neurointerventional procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Initial multicenter experience supports further device evaluation; leaves open its role in routine neurointerventional access pending prospective data.
Introduction Neurointerventional guide catheters are the outermost catheters used for stability and access for smaller catheters. Most guide catheters have distinct transition points of their mechanical properties, which may hinder their advancement into the cerebrovasculature. Here, we present first-in-human data of the 7F Radical guide catheter, which is manufactured using a polymer jacket to allow for continuous transition of mechanical properties along its length.Methods This multicenter retrospective study reviewed cases using the 7F Radical catheter. Details regarding pathology, technical failures, adverse events, and adjunct devices were collected. Images of catheter position were graded by a blinded neurointerventionalist for distal catheter position in the internal carotid artery (ICA), external carotid artery, and vertebrobasilar vasculature.Results Four institutions contributed 154 consecutive cases. Vascular access included the femoral (61.7%) and radial arteries (31.2%) and femoral vein (7.1%). The most common pathologies were cerebral aneurysms (56.5%) and subdural hematomas (13.6%). The guide catheter was used in a biaxial system in 76.6% of cases. For ICA access, the catheter was positioned in the proximal cavernous ICA or more distal in 69.2% of cases. There was one catheter-related adverse event of thrombus formation on the catheter tip and nine non-device-related adverse events. There was one case of the 7F Radical catheter being exchanged for an 8F guide for additional support.Conclusions The 7F Radical guide catheter is effective in establishing distal cerebrovascular access for neurointerventions with an acceptable safety profile. In select cases, an intermediate catheter may be omitted for a biaxial system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philbrick et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Neurovascular pathologies (primarily cerebral aneurysms and subdural hematomas) (n=154). 7F Radical guide catheter was evaluated on Distal catheter position in the proximal cavernous ICA or more distal (for ICA access). The 7F Radical guide catheter achieved proximal cavernous or more distal ICA access in 69.2% of cases and was used in a biaxial system in 76.6%, with 1 catheter-related adverse event.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: