Key result
Higher miR-320 linked to ~80% lower odds of in-stent restenosis per SD.
Why the study?
The associations of circulating GAS5, miR-320, Beclin-1, and LC3 with angiographically confirmed in-stent restenosis and its severity after drug-eluting stent implantation were evaluated.
Does a combined panel of serum GAS5, miR-320, Beclin-1, and LC3 improve contemporaneous discrimination of angiographically confirmed in-stent restenosis in patients after drug-eluting stent implantation?
Observational (n=132)
Does a combined panel of serum GAS5, miR-320, Beclin-1, and LC3 improve contemporaneous discrimination of angiographically confirmed in-stent restenosis in patients after drug-eluting stent implantation?
A combined serum panel of autophagy-related biomarkers (GAS5, miR-320, Beclin-1, and LC3) demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.88) for the contemporaneous identification of coronary in-stent restenosis at six months post-DES implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for autophagy biomarkers in restenosis; does not support clinical adoption without prospective validation.
Objective This study evaluated whether circulating GAS5, miR-320, Beclin-1, and LC3 are associated with angiographically confirmed in-stent restenosis (ISR) and its angiographic severity in patients after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Methods In this retrospective matched observational study, 132 patients (60 ISR, 72 non-ISR) were stratified by coronary angiography within six months of PCI; 1:1 propensity score matching yielded 52 pairs (104 patients). Serum GAS5 and miR-320 (qRT-PCR) and Beclin-1 and LC3 (ELISA) were measured at baseline and at the six-month follow-up. Correlation, ROC, and regression analyses evaluated contemporaneous diagnostic accuracy and associations with ISR. Results After PSM, all SMDs were ≤ 0.27 (13 of 20 covariates < 0.10). ISR patients had higher GAS5, Beclin-1, and LC3 and lower miR-320 than non-ISR patients at both timepoints (all P < 0.001). All four biomarkers correlated with stenosis severity at both timepoints (Spearman |rs| = 0.25–0.60). Using six-month values obtained concurrently with angiography, the combined panel achieved an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80–0.93), exceeding Beclin-1 and LC3 (both P < 0.01) and miR-320 (P = 0.041), with a non-significant trend versus GAS5 (P = 0.082). Lower miR-320 and higher Beclin-1 remained independently associated with ISR; conditional logistic regression confirmed miR-320 as the most robust marker (OR = 0.20 per SD, P = 0.023). Baseline (pre-PCI) analyses are reported separately as exploratory. Conclusion Serum GAS5, miR-320, Beclin-1, and LC3 are promising autophagy-related biomarkers for the contemporaneous discrimination of angiographically confirmed ISR, and combined detection improves diagnostic reliability. Because biomarkers and ISR were assessed at the same visit without longitudinal outcomes, these findings do not establish prospective prediction and require external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation (n=132). Serum GAS5, miR-320, Beclin-1, and LC3 levels vs. Non-ISR patients / single biomarker levels was evaluated on Angiographically confirmed in-stent restenosis (ISR) (AUC 0.88 (combined panel); OR 0.20 per SD (miR-320), 95% CI 0.80-0.93, p=0.023). Combined serum GAS5, miR-320, Beclin-1, and LC3 discriminated in-stent restenosis with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.93), with miR-320 independently associated (OR 0.20 per SD, P=0.023).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: