Key result
Higher SIRI is linked to ~2.4-fold higher odds of severe coronary lesions on angiography.
Why the study?
The systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) reflects systemic inflammatory status, but its association with CAD severity in patients undergoing first-time coronary angiography remained unclear.
Is the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) associated with angiographic coronary artery lesion severity (Gensini score) in patients undergoing first-time coronary angiography?
Observational (n=219)
Single-blind
No
Is the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) associated with angiographic coronary artery lesion severity (Gensini score) in patients undergoing first-time coronary angiography?
The systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) is positively associated with angiographic coronary artery disease severity in patients undergoing first-time coronary angiography and may serve as an inexpensive adjunctive biomarker for pre-procedural risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SIRI-CAD severity link is hypothesis-generating; should not yet change risk stratification or prompt prospective adoption.
Background Inflammation drives coronary artery disease (CAD). The systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) reflects systemic inflammatory status, yet its association with CAD severity in first-time coronary angiography patients remains unclear. Methods This retrospective study included 219 inpatients undergoing initial coronary angiography. CAD severity was quantified by the Gensini score. Patients were divided into SIRI quartiles. Spearman correlation, multivariable linear regression, logistic regression, and ROC analyses were performed. Results Median Gensini scores increased across SIRI quartiles (Q1: 16.75, Q2: 44.00, Q3: 40.00, Q4: 52.00; P < 0.001). SIRI correlated positively with the Gensini score (rho = 0.408, P < 0.001), more strongly than PLR, remnant cholesterol, and RC/HDL-C, with no significant difference vs. neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index(SII), or pan-immune-inflammation value(PIV). In the prespecified primary model adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders, SIRI remained significantly associated with ln(Gensini score+1) ( β = 0.177, 95% CI: 0.089–0.266, P < 0.001); the association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after additional adjustment for laboratory and lipid parameters ( β = 0.080, 95% CI: −0.021 to 0.182, P = 0.121). Each SIRI unit increase was associated with 2.44-fold higher odds of an above-median Gensini score (>42) (OR = 2.438, 95% CI: 1.544–3.851, P < 0.001). SIRI showed modest discrimination for an above-median Gensini score (AUC: 0.685, 95% CI: 0.615–0.755), numerically the highest among the seven indices but not statistically superior to NLR, SII, or PIV. Subgroup analyses confirmed significant correlations across sex, age, diabetes, and hypertension strata. Conclusions SIRI is positively associated with angiographic CAD severity in patients undergoing first-time coronary angiography. As an inexpensive biomarker derived from routine blood counts, SIRI may serve as an adjunctive tool for pre-procedural risk stratification in this specific population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=219). Systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) vs. Lower SIRI quartiles / per unit increase in SIRI was evaluated on Above-median Gensini score (>42) / angiographic coronary artery lesion severity (OR 2.438, 95% CI 1.544-3.851, p=<0.001). Systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) was positively associated with severe coronary lesions (Gensini >42; OR 2.438, 95% CI 1.544-3.851, P<0.001) in first-time angiography patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: