Key result
Novel nomogram predicts HFpEF hospitalization in hemodialysis patients with ~0.83 C-index.
Why the study?
HFpEF is a common complication in patients on maintenance hemodialysis, and a predictive model for hospitalization risk in this population was needed to facilitate accurate risk assessment, patient stratification, and timely clinical decision-making.
Does a clinical risk prediction model incorporating echocardiographic and functional parameters accurately predict HFpEF-related hospitalization in patients on maintenance hemodialysis with LVEF ≥50%?
Cohort (n=340)
Patients were randomly assigned to training (70%) and validation (30%) sets
Does a clinical risk prediction model incorporating echocardiographic and functional parameters accurately predict HFpEF-related hospitalization in patients on maintenance hemodialysis with LVEF ≥50%?
A novel five-variable nomogram incorporating echocardiographic, dialysis adequacy, and functional exercise metrics accurately predicts the risk of HFpEF-related hospitalization in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid HFpEF risk stratification in hemodialysis patients; leaves open external validation before clinical use.
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common complication in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). A predictive model for hospitalization risk in this population would facilitate accurate risk assessment, patient stratification, and timely clinical decision-making. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled MHD patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% between January and May 2021. The primary endpoint was HFpEF-related hospitalization, with follow-up through December 31, 2024. Predictors were selected using Lasso regression. Patients were randomly assigned to training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to develop the risk prediction model. Results: A total of 340 patients were included (59.7% male; mean age 56.84 ± 12.52 years). Over a median follow-up of 27.7 months, 68 patients (20.0%) experienced HFpEF-related hospitalization. The final predictive model included aortic diameter (AOD), left atrial diameter (LAD), interventricular septal thickness (IVS), urea reduction ratio (URR), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination with a C-index of 0.834. The area under the curve (AUC) for 1- and 1.5-year predictions was 0.867 and 0.875 in the training set, and 0.849 and 0.787 in the validation set, respectively. Calibration and decision curve analysis confirmed model robustness and clinical utility. Conclusion: We developed and validated a simple, practical model to predict HFpEF-related hospitalization in MHD patients. This tool may facilitate early identification of high-risk individuals to guide clinical management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Maintenance hemodialysis with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >=50% (n=340). Risk prediction model (AOD, LAD, IVS, URR, and 6MWD) was evaluated on HFpEF-related hospitalization. A risk prediction model using AOD, LAD, IVS, URR, and 6MWD predicted HFpEF hospitalization (20.0% rate) in hemodialysis patients with a C-index of 0.834.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: