Key result
Ethacizine dominates Ukrainian class IC antiarrhythmic prescribing, used as pill-in-the-pocket AF therapy by ~52% of physicians.
Why the study?
Real clinical practices in Ukraine regarding the use of class IC antiarrhythmic drugs, particularly ethacizine in a pill-in-the-pocket-like regimen to restore sinus rhythm in paroxysmal and persistent AF, needed to be identified.
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
Yes
This national survey demonstrates that Ukrainian physicians frequently prescribe the class IC antiarrhythmic drug ethacizine in outpatient settings—including off-guideline "pill-in-the-pocket" and high-dose regimens—for sinus rhythm restoration in atrial fibrillation, highlighting an urgent need for formal clinical trials to validate the safety and efficacy of these practices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ethacizine use for AF should not yet change practice; leaves open the need for randomized safety and efficacy trials.
The aim of the study: based on a survey of physicians, the study aims to identify the real clinical practices regarding the use of class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in Ukraine, particularly ethacizine, for restoring sinus rhythm in paroxysmal and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation, employing a methodology similar to the “pill-in-the-pocket” approach. Materials and methods. Data were analysed from 100 anonymous voluntary questionnaires. We used snowball sampling to collect the responses. Participants had the option to skip questions, and calculations were based on the number of respondents who answered each question. Results. More than half of the respondents actively prescribe class IC antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), with ethacizine being the most commonly prescribed (56.8 % of respondents). Notably, 61.4 % of respondents had never prescribed flecainide, 34.3 % had never prescribed propafenone, and 18.6 % had never prescribed ethacizine. The primary indication for prescribing class IC AADs was atrial fibrillation (AF) (43.3 %), followed by the combination of ventricular and supraventricular rhythm disturbances (34.4 %). Only 13.8 % of respondents initiate therapy with class IC AADs exclusively in inpatient settings, while 31.9 % primarily did so in outpatient settings with ECG monitoring. More than half of the respondents reported experience restoring sinus rhythm (SR) in AF with ethacizine using a regimen similar to “pill-in-the-pocket”; over a quarter of these cases were decisions made by patients already on ethacizine for SR maintenance. More than a quarter of respondents had experience using ethacizine for the “acute treatment” of AF in single doses higher than the standard 100 mg (125 mg – 6.8 %; 150 mg – 20.3 %). At the same time, 31.9 % of respondents prescribed ethacizine for SR restoration in AF as discrete regimens, prescribing low doses at shorter intervals (1–3 hours). Conclusions. The survey results indicate that class IC AADs, especially ethacizine, are actively prescribed in real clinical practice not only for arrhythmia prevention, including AF, but also for SR restoration. This underscores the need for high-quality clinical studies to assess the efficacy and safety of such treatment strategies for ethacizine, which remains less studied within class IC AADs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sydorova et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation and other cardiac rhythm and conduction disorders (n=100). Ethacizine (class IC antiarrhythmic drug, including 'pill-in-the-pocket' and discrete regimens) vs. Propafenone and flecainide was evaluated on Physician satisfaction score (0–10 scale) for efficacy and safety (p=0.014). Ethacizine was the most frequently prescribed class IC antiarrhythmic drug and was used as a 'pill-in-the-pocket' for atrial fibrillation by 52.2% of surveyed Ukrainian physicians.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: