Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Visual speech recognition (VSR) for low-resource languages remains challenging, particularly for Indonesian lipreading.This study investigates whether adding architectural components or audio information can substantially improve word-level recognition on the IDLRW (Indonesian Lipreading Word) dataset (48,083 clips, 100 classes).Using a controlled pipeline and the same test set (n = 4,893), we compare visual-only and multimodal configurations using Top-1 word accuracy rate (WAR).A convolutional encoder outperforms the initially considered Vision Transformer at this data scale.The largest improvement comes from better visual-temporal representation: domain-specific pretraining adds 3.0 percentage points, while replacing the temporal encoder with a Conformer using corrected relative positional encoding adds a further 4.8 percentage points.Audio-logit distillation alone provides no measurable benefit, whereas representation-level audio knowledge improves performance through cross-modal memory.A homophone analysis indicates a practical visual ceiling of 72-73%, compared with 93.29% for audio.The best model achieves 61.97% WAR, while a four-model ensemble achieves 63.72%, exceeding the published baseline of 60.51%.These results suggest that visual information, rather than model capacity, remains the main limitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fatta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: