Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives Accurate assessment of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) is crucial for guiding surgical planning. While size-based criteria remain standard, they may underestimate therapy-induced biological changes. To develop and validate the neoadjuvant breast imaging reporting and data system (NacBI-RADS), a structured multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) lexicon was designed to evaluate NAC response and support surgical decision-making. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 68 BC patients who underwent staging and post-NAC MRI, followed by surgery. mp-MRI examinations included contrast-enhanced T1, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted imaging. NacBI-RADS integrates four parameters: peritumoral edema, ΔADC (apparent diffusion coefficient change), post-contrast tumor size, and lymph node status (Node-RADS). Three independent breast radiologists evaluated all cases. Inter-reader agreement was assessed with Cohen’s and Fleiss’ kappa. Results Of 88 patients assessed, 68 were included. Residual disease was found in 43 patients (63%) and pathological complete response in 25 (37%). Most lesions were categorized as NacBI-RADS 1–2, while categories 4–5 were less frequent (12–15%). NacBI-RADS showed high diagnostic performance (AUC 0.942–0.960) with excellent reproducibility (κ 0.931–0.953). Lower categories were associated with complete or near-complete response, and higher categories with residual disease ( p < 0.001). Conclusion This exploratory study suggests that NacBI-RADS may offer a standardized and reproducible mp-MRI framework for assessing NAC response. Further studies are needed to confirm its role in imaging-guided surgical planning. Key Points Question Can a structured mp-MRI framework improve the accuracy and reproducibility of assessing BC response to NAC compared with conventional size-based criteria ? Findings NacBI-RADS showed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC up to 0.960) and excellent inter-reader agreement, reliably distinguishing complete/partial-complete responders from patients with residual disease . Clinical relevance NacBI-RADS may support more accurate and reproducible response assessment after NAC, helping identify true complete responders and aiding safe, personalized surgical de-escalation strategies in BC management .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cicciarelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: