Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dyes are widely used in the textile industry, and untreated dye-containing effluents pose major environmental risks. This study investigates pine bark (Pinus pinaster), a timber by-product, as a low-cost biosorbent for dye removal. Powdered and granular bark was impregnated with 10% (w/w) iron using Incipient Wetness Impregnation with sonication or High-Pressure Impregnation (HPI) at 75–300 MPa, followed by thermal treatment at 400 °C under nitrogen and hydrogen. Adsorption tests with a synthetic dye mixture (80 mg/L) showed that HPI at 150 MPa provided the best performance, achieving over 90% color removal with no iron leaching. Thermal treatment enhanced iron fixation and adsorption, producing the most effective material (G1FeTT). With real textile effluent, G1FeTT (5.0 g/L) achieved 83.5% dye removal with equilibrium at 16 h (2.12 mg/g). The Elovich model best described the kinetics. Treated effluent reuse in dyeing baths was feasible, enabling 25–75% freshwater substitution while maintaining acceptable color metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: