Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As automated vehicles (AVs) accumulate functions and information layers, integrating and orchestrating drivers’ in-vehicle experiences remain insufficiently understood design challenges. This study examines sensory, cognitive, hedonic, and social aspects of in-vehicle experience and how experiential values, functions, and interactions are linked over time. We conducted a systematic literature review of 128 papers and studied 27 AV owners using UX Curve elicitation and semi-structured interviews. Based on interview coding and UX Curve ratings, we propose a conceptual framework organizing ten experiential value dimensions across four experience phases: anticipation, familiarization, functional dependence, and practice & meaning transformation. These dimensions include aesthetic pleasure, comfort, efficiency, safety & security, economic sustainability, novelty, flexibility & control, emotional management, relatedness, and identity. We further derive five experience design patterns and articulate an experience-driven design space through four generative charts for future human–vehicle interaction (HVI) design exploration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: