Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novae are spectroscopically classified as Fe ii or He/N according to the dominance of Fe ii , or He and N emission lines in their prenebular spectra, while spectra exhibiting both are classified as hybrid. Whereas the spectral class of a nova is known to correlate with its progenitor properties, a recent detailed spectroscopic follow-up of 10 novae suggests instead a time evolution from “early He/N” to “Fe II ” and to “late He/N.” We investigate here this apparent contradiction using a spectroscopic data set of 26 novae from the Astronomical Ring for Amateur Spectroscopy (ARAS) database. For this purpose we introduce a quantitative coefficient, κ , defined as the ratio of the flux of the Fe ii λ 5169 line to the mean flux of five He and N emission lines, with κ > 1 indicating Fe ii –dominated spectra and κ < 1 indicating He/N-dominated spectra. This coefficient is shown to provide a reliable quantitative tool for tracing nova spectral evolution while reducing biases from incomplete coverage. A significant fraction of the novae in our sample exhibit at least one transition between Fe ii – and He/N-dominated phases. The time evolution of κ closely follows their optical light curves, repeatedly crossing unity in novae exhibiting jitters, which reveal nonmonotonic spectral evolution. Since the light-curve shapes and their timescales depend on intrinsic progenitor properties, particularly white dwarf mass, they also determine the duration of Fe ii – and He/N-dominated phases, introducing a bias in spectral classification when it relies on early, sparse spectra.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kopsacheili et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: