Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The state of a perovskite precursor ink is set by how its solvents coordinate the precursors, yet the roles of individual solvents in green mixtures remain poorly understood. We examine how 2-methoxyethanol (2Me) and 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone (DMI) share the solvation of the four precursors of a formamidinium–methylammonium (FA–MA) lead iodide–bromide ink: PbI2, PbBr2, FAI and MABr. Cluster–continuum DFT calculations (r2SCAN-3c/SMD) of the exchange of 2Me for DMI in the first solvation shell show that PbI2 prefers DMI, whereas PbBr2 and MABr prefer 2Me (+4.9 and +6.3 kJ mol−1 per DMI) and FAI has no clear preference (+2.0 kJ mol−1); in FAI and MABr, 2Me donates O–H···X− hydrogen bonds. A thermodynamic model built on these energies is consistent with 2Me-rich mixtures (about 10–20 vol% DMI) as a tentative compromise. All 2Me/DMI mixtures wet PTAA, with the contact angle falling from 24.7° (2Me) to 13.3° (DMI). Without an anti-solvent (gas quenching only), the 2Me:DMI ink gives on PTAA a film with larger grains in the imaged areas than the DMF:DMSO ink, with the same absorption onset (776 nm) and a similar photoluminescence band. With literature data on blade-coated films, these results support testing 2Me/DMI for anti-solvent-free, large-area processing of FA–MA perovskites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oblakulov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: