Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines the impact of different education channels for fundamental engineering courses from a student’s perspective, including online, face-to-face, and blended learning, on student engagement and satisfaction. By examining these channels, the research aims to provide an inclusive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by these different channels, drawing on student experiences. Findings suggest that while online delivery channels offer flexibility and accessibility, the lack of engagement, interaction, and direct feedback makes face-to-face learning much more preferable. Education should incorporate a practical communication approach to understanding the message of the complex engineering curriculum and feedback, while minimizing noise. The paper concludes with suggestions for improving approaches to enhance learning outcomes in both face-to-face and online classrooms, informed by feedback from the recipient student body.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elissa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: