Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the prospects for developing Uzbekistan's tax system through a structured comparison of international experience in tax policy and tax administration. The analysis combines a review of Uzbekistan's statutory tax framework with evidence from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and official tax administration sources. It identifies five strategic reform dimensions: legal predictability and tax-base quality, digital integration, risk-based compliance, taxpayercentred services, and equity and environmental sustainability. Estonia's extensive use of electronic tax filing, Singapore's pre-filled tax return arrangements, and Georgia's risk-oriented administration of large taxpayers offer distinct lessons rather than ready-made institutional models. A five-dimensional Tax System Development Index (TSDI) and a phased implementation matrix are proposed to translate international evidence into measurable national policy priorities. The study is conceptual and comparative; it does not claim to estimate causal effects for Uzbekistan or report a measured national TSDI score. Its principal contribution is a practical framework linking tax system design to service delivery, tax compliance, transparency, and economic resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibragimov Aziz Turayevich (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: