Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: This study examined problematic media use among children living in earthquake-affected and comparison settings and its associations with family digital practices, sociodemographic characteristics, and parent-, family-, and household-level earthquake-related adversities. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 564 parents of children aged 4 to 11 years from both earthquake-affected and non-affected regions. The study was conducted in the provinces of Adıyaman and Bitlis in Türkiye; while Adıyaman was affected by the 2023 Türkiye–Syria earthquake, Bitlis remained unaffected. The Problematic Media Use Measure (PMUM) assessed children’s media behaviors. Results: Earthquake-related analyses were restricted to the Adıyaman subsample (n = 323). In the primary adjusted continuous-count model, each additional reported adversity was associated with a 5.47-point higher PMUM total score (B = 5.473, 95% CI: 2.986 to 7.961; p < 0.001). However, the adjusted categorical model did not demonstrate a consistently graded pattern across adversity levels; only participants reporting all four adversities had significantly higher PMUM scores than those reporting none (B = 38.31, 95% CI: 24.24 to 52.38; p < 0.001). After excluding this small subgroup (n = 18), the continuous-count association was attenuated but remained statistically significant (B = 2.94, 95% CI: 0.23 to 5.65; p = 0.034). In the individual-indicator model, the responding parent’s experience of being trapped under debris was associated with a higher PMUM total score (B = 45.61, 95% CI: 36.22 to 54.99; p < 0.001), whereas the other earthquake-related indicators were not independently associated with PMUM scores. Older child age, male sex, and longer maternal and child digital device use were also associated with higher PMUM scores. Conclusions: Within the Adıyaman subsample, the association between the number of reported earthquake-related adversities and PMUM scores was influenced by the small subgroup reporting all four adversities but persisted at a reduced magnitude after their exclusion. The categorical analysis did not support a uniform graded relationship, while the individual-indicator analysis identified the responding parent’s experience of being trapped under debris as the strongest independent earthquake-related correlate. These findings concern parent-, family-, and household-level adversities and should not be interpreted as evidence of the child’s direct traumatic exposure or as establishing causality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakırhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: