Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Blind mechanical dilatation is the conventional response to a cervix that cannot be negotiated during operative hysteroscopy and is often implicated in perforation. We evaluated a graded, vision-controlled strategy for difficult cervical access. Methods: Retrospective single-surgeon cohort of 973 eligible no-touch vaginoscopic operative hysteroscopies (2023–2026) using a 7.25 mm mechanical tissue removal system. Each difficult cervix was graded 1–4 from first-approach morphology; four escalating vision-controlled techniques were selected intraoperatively, not by grade, with blind dilatation as rescue. The primary outcome was uterine access. Results: Difficult access occurred in 139 procedures (14.3%). Access was achieved in all 128 grade 1–3 patients (100%, 95% CI 97.2–100) and in 5 of 11 with grade 4 (45.5%, 16.7–76.6); overall 133/139 (95.7%, 90.8–98.4). Among successful passages, cervical passage time increased across grades (medians 37, 101, 170 and 240 s; p < 0.001); operation time did not (p = 0.11). Perforation occurred in five patients (3.6%): one during vision-controlled passage and four during blind rescue dilatation after failed grade 4 attempts; all were managed conservatively. Conclusions: Vision-controlled passage achieved access without blind dilatation in every cervix not completely obliterated; complete obstruction remains its limit. The grading and techniques require prospective, multicentre and interobserver validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cihan Bademkıran (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: