Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate ship trajectory prediction supports encounter-risk screening and vessel traffic services, but latent intent makes future motion multi-modal across temporal scales. We propose Multi-Modal Multi-Scale Temporal Attention GRU (MM-MSTA-GRU), which adaptively fuses short, mid, and global temporal attention and uses K mode-conditioned decoders trained with Winner-Take-All and diversity objectives. On 26 days of Danish Maritime Authority AIS data ( ∼ 38,000 cargo and tanker trajectories), the deterministic variant achieves the best ADE, FDE, and MAE among the evaluated point predictors. The multi-modal variant yields 21.93 m minADE and 45.83 m minFDE over five minutes, increasing 100 m endpoint coverage from 87.0% ( K = 1 ) to 92.1%, while its highest-probability trajectory achieves 27.80 / 63.65 m ADE/FDE. On the geographically distinct NAIS harbor dataset, the predicted set obtains 73.33 m minFDE and 80.8% coverage. Mode-ranking probabilities are calibrated for oracle-best-mode selection (ECE 0.029), and the method outperforms four native multi-modal baselines in combined geometric and probabilistic quality. A conservative flag-if-any-mode rule recovers 72% of dangerous encounters missed by a point forecast in controlled tests and 70% on real held-out encounters—a recall-oriented operating point that trades precision for recall (higher false-alarm rate, lower F 1 ); the balanced probability-weighted set instead attains the best F 1 and PR-AUC at every safety radius at essentially unchanged decision accuracy. These results support a compact probabilistic predictor for maritime decision support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: