Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Male infertility is usually assessed using separate parameters, while a simple integrated male-oriented tool is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To develop a Male Fertility Index (MFI), assess its association with natural conception after varicocelectomy, and perform preliminary external validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This two-center cohort study included 149 infertile men with clinical varicocele: 99 in the development cohort and 50 in the validation cohort. Preoperative variables were analyzed against natural conception within 12 months. ROC-derived AUCs for total progressively motile sperm count, total motility, male age, and infertility duration were used to construct the MFI. RESULTS: Natural conception occurred in 30/99 couples (30.3%). MFI values were higher in men whose partners conceived (1.44 [0.87-2.15] vs. 0.64 [0.25-1.31], p < 0.001). Conception was more frequent with MFI > 0.8 than with MFI ≤ 0.8 (44.4% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.0017). In validation, corresponding rates were 40.0% and 14.3%; AUC was 0.795 (95% CI 0.650-0.911). DISCUSSION: The MFI showed a similar association with natural conception in both cohorts, although validation was limited by sample size and incomplete assessment of female factors. CONCLUSION: The MFI may summarize male reproductive status in infertile men with clinical varicocele. Its weighting and cut-off require confirmation in larger cohorts, and its usefulness in other infertility settings remains to be established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shomarufov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: