Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The depth to water in a well or borehole can be found from the echo of a sharp sound made at the wellhead: depth is half the speed of sound times the echo delay. This paper computes how accurate that simple method is, for two ways of timing the echo — by ear with a stopwatch, and from a phone recording — using a speed of sound of 340.4 m per second at a stated shaft temperature of 15 °C, a stated shaft-temperature uncertainty of 3 °C, a stated human timing uncertainty of 0.20 s, and a stated phone onset-picking uncertainty of 3 ms. The stopwatch method carries a timing error of 34.04 m at every depth and cannot certify any ordinary well: an echo from 10 m returns in 0.0588 s, far inside human reaction time, and the method would need a depth of 340.9 m before its relative error even fell to 10 percent. The phone method carries an error of 0.51 m at 10 m, 0.52 m at 20 m, 0.58 m at 50 m, and 0.74 m at 100 m, and under a stated round-trip audibility model it can certify a depth to a stated tolerance of plus or minus 1.0 m down to 59.4 m over calm water, or 42.0 m over a rough surface. The method costs essentially nothing: a phone already owned is priced at 0 dollars of added cost, against 12 dollars for the stopwatch that cannot do the job. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: