Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A hole drilled freehand is seldom perpendicular, and the resulting exit error grows with depth. This paper quantifies that problem for a stated unpractised user and designs a simple bushed guide block that bounds it. Freehand angular error is modelled as normally distributed with a standard deviation of 3.5 degrees: the mean absolute error is 2.793 degrees, the 90th-percentile absolute error is 5.757 degrees, and 56.77 percent of holes are off square by more than 2 degrees. At a depth of 50 mm the 90th-percentile hole-position error is 5.04 mm. A 25 mm thick guide block with a new diametral bush clearance of 0.15 mm bounds the angle to 0.344 degrees and the position error at 50 mm depth to 0.30 mm, a 16.8-fold reduction at the 90th percentile. That performance does not last. The clearance that corresponds to a 0.5-degree bound is only 0.218 mm and to a 1.0-degree bound only 0.436 mm. At a stated wear rate of 0.0030 mm per hole for a mild-steel bush, the 0.5-degree limit is reached after 22 holes and the 1.0-degree limit after 95 holes; a hardened bush at 0.00040 mm per hole reaches them after 170 and 715 holes respectively, and a polymer bush at 0.012 mm per hole after only 5 and 23 holes. The guide therefore works, but only as a wear-limited device: a soft bush is a short-lived consumable, not a permanent tool. A sizing rule is given: to hold a 0.5-degree bound at a worn clearance of 0.40 mm, the guide height must be at least 45.8 mm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: