Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Knowledge of emergency medical services (EMS) and awareness of emergency contact numbers are important for emergency preparedness among older patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their caregivers. This study aimed to assess self-reported EMS knowledge, awareness of Thailand’s emergency number 1669, previous EMS utilization, prior EMS training, and associated factors among both groups in rural Northern Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 828 participants comprising independently recruited older patients with chronic diseases (n = 414) and caregivers (n = 414). Data were collected using structured questionnaires and clinical assessments. Associations with self-reported EMS knowledge and awareness of the emergency number 1669 were examined using multivariable binary logistic regression separately for each group. Results: Among older patients, 60.1% reported familiarity with EMS, 57.7% were aware of the emergency number 1669, 11.8% had previously used EMS, and 8.0% had received EMS training. The corresponding proportions among caregivers were 48.3%, 39.6%, 9.4%, and 17.6%, respectively. Among patients, educational attainment, receipt of NCD-related information, and HbA1c levels were associated with self-reported EMS knowledge, while educational attainment and NCD-related information were associated with awareness of 1669. Among caregivers, age, occupation, and underlying medical conditions were associated with self-reported EMS knowledge, while age, occupation, underlying medical conditions, and poster exposure were associated with awareness of 1669. Conclusions: Self-reported EMS knowledge and awareness of the emergency number 1669 varied between older patients with chronic diseases and caregivers. These findings highlight the importance of targeted community-based educational initiatives to improve EMS-related knowledge and emergency number awareness in rural communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chairinkam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: