Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), particularly photocatalysis, have proven to be highly effective process for phenol degradation. In this study, a novel TiO 2 -based photocatalyst was developed for phenol degradation from aqueous solution under UV light (365 nm). The catalyst was synthesized via the sol-gel method, and the composite contained 5 wt% of NiFe 2 O 4 and 95 wt% of TiO 2 -SiO 2 . Characterization techniques including XRD, FESEM with EDX, FTIR, UV-Vis spectroscopy, and VSM were performed to reveal crystallinity, surface morphology, surface chemistry, bandgap and magnetic properties. XRD peaks confirmed the successful integration of spinel NiFe 2 O 4 (a ≈ 8.35 Å) into the anatase TiO 2 -SiO 2 phase (a ≈ 3.79 Å, c ≈ 9.51 Å) with an average crystallite size of 5.55 nm. FESEM revealed a rough, spherical and partially agglomerated morphology, while FTIR verified composite formation through characteristic Ti-O-Si, Ti-O-Ti, Ni-O, and Fe-O vibrational bands. Under the catalyst comparison condition (pH 7), the NiFe 2 O 4 /TiO 2 -SiO 2 nanocomposite achieved 97.6% phenol removal, which was further increased to complete removal (100%) after optimization of solution pH to 5. It also showed a narrow band gap of 2.40 eV, whereas TiO 2 showed 3.2 eV, displaying a redshift. Furthermore, VSM analysis revealed a saturation magnetization of 1.48 emu/g, indicating that the composite retains a measurable magnetic response. Under the optimized laboratory conditions (0.5 g/L catalyst dose, pH 5, and 10 ppm initial phenol concentration), complete phenol removal was achieved under UV irradiation within 240 min. Kinetic study revealed that phenol degradation follows a pseudo first order kinetic model as the best fit. These findings demonstrate the potential of NiFe 2 O 4 /TiO 2 -SiO 2 as a magnetic photocatalytic material for phenol removal under the investigated laboratory conditions. Further studies on catalyst reusability, real wastewater performance, mineralization, and environmental impact assessment are required to evaluate practical applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banhi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: