Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Monthly rainfall information is essential for water management and rainfed agriculture in semi-arid Kurdistan Region of Iraq. This study developed a Mamdani fuzzy inference system (FIS-RH-T-E) in MATLAB that estimates monthly rainfall in Sulaymaniyah from relative humidity (RH), temperature, and evaporation, using 140 expert rules and data from Bakrajo station (2010–2024, n = 180). The FIS was compared with multiple linear regressions (MLR), random forest, gradient boosting, support vector regression, a multilayer perceptron and monthly climatology, evaluated by leave-one-year-out cross-validation and a 2020–2024 hold-out, including one-month-ahead prediction. Climatology alone achieved a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.45. The FIS reached a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.63 and NSE = 0.63 (Kling-Gupta efficiency 0.71), second only to MLR (R 2 = 0.67, NSE = 0.66) and ahead of support vector regression, gradient boosting and random forest (NSE 0.61–0.62); differences among these five models were not significant, whereas all clearly outperformed climatology and multilayer perceptron (NSE = 0.44). Scored on their training data, the machine-learning models reached NSE up to 0.84, which overstates their accuracy. RH dominated both FIS response surfaces and data-driven analyses (anomaly correlation with rainfall 0.63, against − 0.21 for temperature and evaporation). All models underestimated the wettest months; the FIS never exceeded 221 mm, whereas observed rainfall reached 316 mm. No model predicted rainfall one month ahead better than climatology. An expert-defined FIS therefore provides transparent estimates as accurate as machine learning for filling gaps in rainfall records, whereas forecasting requires large-scale predictors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: