Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Households are usually told to place mouse traps a short distance apart, but no spacing is ever derived. This study models a house mouse making 60 m of wall-following travel per night along a 24 m run of kitchen and store-room wall, with each baited snap trap drawing investigation from 0.6 m either side, an investigation probability of 0.55 per zone entry, and a capture probability of 0.75 given investigation. Because the mouse re-crosses the same wall many times a night, capture probability saturates quickly: a single trap on the whole run still gives a 0.735 capture probability per night, and two traps at 12 m spacing give 0.93 per night and 0.995 within 48 hours, at a hardware cost of USD 4.80. The widest spacing that reaches at least 99 percent capture probability within 48 hours is therefore 12 m under the stated assumptions, and spacings of 1.5 to 4 m buy almost nothing except redundancy against a sprung or occupied trap. The originated rule is to space traps at up to 12 m on a known run, place them at wall junctions and behind appliances first, and spend the saved effort on nightly checking. This study is simulated, not measured. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: