Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To compare voice-related quality of life and endoscopic outcomes in patients with Reinke's edema treated with an office-based 445-nm blue laser versus microlaryngoscopy under general anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty-three patients underwent office-based laser (OBL) treatment and 40 patients underwent microlaryngoscopy under general anesthesia (GA) for Reinke's edema at a tertiary laryngological center between 2018 and 2025. Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) scores and endoscopic grading were assessed before and after treatment. Within-group comparisons used the paired t-test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test; between-group comparisons used the Welch t-test. RESULTS: In the OBL group, VHI-10 scores improved from 15.0 ± 8.8 to 2.0 ± 3.5 (p < 0.001), and 43 of 52 patients (82.7%) achieved complete regression of edema (grade 0). Mean operative time was 6.9 ± 3.1 min, significantly shorter than in the GA group (37.0 ± 17.1 min; p < 0.001). In the GA group, VHI-10 scores improved from 19.5 ± 10.7 to 5.1 ± 6.7 (p < 0.001), with complete regression in 16 of 20 evaluable patients (80.0%). Eleven OBL patients (21.2%) required retreatment (maximum three sessions). No adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Office-based 445-nm blue laser treatment was associated with significant improvements in voice-related quality of life and stroboscopic outcomes, together with significantly shorter operative time than microlaryngoscopy under general anesthesia. These findings support the use of office-based approaches in selected patients with Reinke's edema as a sound alternative to conventional treatment under general anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mora et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: