Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: To evaluate neutralizing antibodies (NAb) against insulin icodec and explore whether an anti-drug antibody (ADA) titer threshold can guide clinically meaningful NAb testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cell-based insulin icodec NAb assay was developed and applied to follow-up samples collected after 6 weeks of drug wash-out from two treat-to-target trials in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. ADA status and titers, NAb status, efficacy, and safety outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 355 follow-up samples, 270 (76%) were ADA positive and 35 (9.9%) were NAb positive. Neither ADA nor NAb status was associated with safety or efficacy concerns. The rate of NAb positivity increased with ADA titer. A titer threshold of 200 improved reliability and interpretability and reduced the number of samples requiring NAb testing by 68%. A higher threshold would be required during active treatment because of residual drug interference. CONCLUSIONS: NAb testing. When NAb testing is required, an appropriate ADA titer threshold should guide sample selection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov IDs NCT03751657 and NCT04795531.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toft‐Hansen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: