Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most aggressive primary brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. Radiomics has emerged as a promising approach for survival prediction, although most studies focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We investigated whether post-operative radiotherapy-planning computed tomography (CT) radiomics can predict survival in GBM patients. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed 26 patients with GBM who underwent surgery and completed standard chemoradiotherapy, including radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with temozolomide. Radiomic features (n = 107) were extracted from non-contrast-enhanced post-operative CT scans of the tumor bed. Logistic regression models with elastic-net regularisation were developed to predict survival at 3, 6, and 12 months using leave-one-out cross-validation. A Cox proportional hazards model was built for continuous survival prediction. Results: The 3-month survival model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.935 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81–1.00] with 78.7% sensitivity and 89.6% specificity. The 6-month model showed moderate performance (AUC = 0.712), while the 12-month model had limited discriminative ability (AUC = 0.568). The Cox radiomics model achieved a concordance index of 0.771. Median tumor-bed volume was 64.0 cm 3 [interquartile range (IQR): 25.6–99.5; range 8.5–211.8]. Conclusions: Post-operative CT radiomics demonstrated promising performance for short-term survival prediction in this single-institution cohort. Because of the small sample size, the high AUC of the 3-month model should be interpreted as exploratory and may partly reflect cohort-specific overfitting. External validation in larger cohorts is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: