Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A field measured along the ground returns the area of its surface, which is always larger than its horizontal, or map, area, and the difference is frequently ignored because gentle-looking slopes feel harmless. This study computes the overstatement exactly for uniform slopes, patch by patch for mixed fields, and adds the smaller contribution of rope sag under stated assumptions. The overstatement is 0.382% at 5 degrees, 1.5427% at 10 degrees, 3.5276% at 15 degrees, 6.4178% at 20 degrees, and 15.4701% at 30 degrees; it passes 2% at a slope of 11.3649 degrees and 5% at 17.7528 degrees. Mixed fields defeat the common shortcut of correcting by the mean slope: a field half flat and half at 20 degrees overstates by 3.2089%, more than double the 1.5427% suggested by its 10 degree mean slope, because the correction factor is convex. Rope sag is a second-order effect by comparison, adding 0.2134% to area at a sag ratio of 0.02 on a 20 m rope, though a slack rope at a sag ratio of 0.05 adds 1.3378%. The correction rule is: estimate the slope of each distinct patch with a rope and a plumb line over a 10 m run (rise readable to give the factor to within 0.1736% at 10 degrees under stated assumptions), divide each patch's ground area by the secant of its slope, and never skip the correction above 11.3649 degrees when a 2% error matters or above 17.7528 degrees when a 5% error matters. This study is simulated, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: