Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Museum lighting is specified for a standard observer, yet the retina of a 75-year-old receives less than half the light of a 25-year-old’s. This modelling study applies an age-dependent observer (CIE 170-1 fundamentals with the ageing lens, theWatson–Yellott pupil, two-stage chromatic adaptation and the CIE 146 glare factor) to public-domain reproductions of eight Louvre paintings under 50–500 lx. Three endpoints are kept apart: lens-corrected retinal illuminance, modelled colour appearance (CIEDE2000) and the fraction of picture area below 3, 10 or 30 td. Relative to a 25-year-old, retinal illuminance is 0.70 at 50 and 0.42 at 75 years, equivalent to dividing the illuminance by 2.4; the area below 10 td at 75 years ranges from 10% for the Wedding at Cana to 85% for Saint John the Baptist. Illuminance presets of 1.5 and 2 times within 250 lx recover most of the 50-year deficit for 11–22% more daily exposure in a two-hour slot, whereas a Duv −0.02 spectrum adds 30–41% damage-weighted exposure without benefit. Photographs of the 2024 cleaning of Liberty Leading the People cannot separate a varnish effect from white balance. Sensitivity to all uncertain inputs is reported, and the perceptual test needed is specified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afif Siddiki (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: