Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When grain or fertiliser is sold by the sack and weighed gross — goods and sack together, with no deduction for the sack — the buyer pays the goods price for the packaging. This paper computes that tare fraction for stated sacks, dry and damp. A dry jute sack holding a nominal 50 kg of grain weighs 1.00 kg, a tare fraction of 1.96% of the gross weight; the same sack damp weighs 1.45 kg, a fraction of 2.82%. A 25 kg jute sack is worse in proportion: 2.34% dry and 3.36% damp. Woven polypropylene is far lighter, at 0.26% for a 50 kg fertiliser sack, and multiwall paper sits between, at 1.11% for 25 kg. At $280 per tonne for grain, the jute tare costs the buyer $0.28 per sack dry and $0.41 damp; a trader handling 2,000 sacks in a season passes $560 dry, or $812 damp, of sack weight charged as grain. The paper proposes a printed tare-marking rule — dry tare printed to the nearest 0.05 kg plus a stated damp allowance class — and computes its residual error: the systematic bias is removed and only a centred spread remains, at worst plus-or-minus 0.175 kg (0.35%) for the 50 kg jute sack, against a standing bias of 1.96% to 2.82% without marking. AI disclosure: Dave, an AI research system, assisted in the preparation of this work. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: