Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated immune thrombocytopenia, with a particular focus on thrombotic risk. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 23 patients with SLE-associated thrombocytopenia treated with eltrombopag. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcomes were sustained platelet response (≥50 ×10 9 /L at last follow-up) and occurrence of thrombotic events. Exploratory analyses assessed associations between antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) status and thrombosis. Results The mean age was 33.7 ± 12.3 years, and 65.2% were female. aPL positivity was present in 52.2% of patients. A sustained platelet response was achieved in 65.2% of patients, and 21.7% were successfully weaned off corticosteroids. Thrombotic events occurred in 8 patients (34.8%), with arterial events accounting for 50% of cases. The median time to thrombosis was 5.5 months. Thrombosis occurred across a range of platelet counts and was not consistently associated with thrombocytosis. A higher proportion of thrombotic events was observed in aPL-positive patients (41.7% vs 27.3%), although this did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.90, 95% CI 0.33–11.01, p = 0.667). Conclusion Eltrombopag was associated with platelet response in this cohort. Thrombosis was numerically more common in aPL-positive patients, but the small sample and imprecise estimate preclude conclusions about its independent contribution. Without a comparator group, whether these events reflect eltrombopag, the prothrombotic milieu of SLE and aPL antibodies, or their interaction cannot be determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beltagy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: