Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer opportunities for personalized neurorehabilitation, but inter-session variability, repeated calibration, and the need for expert supervision limit their use beyond supervised settings. We propose a longitudinal BCI framework that integrates neuronal avalanches dynamics, reflecting cascades of propagation neural activity, with graph-theory and data-driven region of interest analysis to extract computationally efficient and neuro-physiological interpretable features. Source-reconstructed EEG from 20 BCI-naive participants performing right-hand motor imagery (MI) and rest across four training sessions was represented by a directed weighted connectivity network based on neuronal avalanches. Local, mesoscopic, and global network measures revealed task-related changes predominantly in contralateral sensorimotor regions and distributed reorganisation across training. We modelled here the learning-related evolution of feature distributions across previous sessions and used this trajectory to predict class-conditional distributions in an unseen fourth session, anticipating future brain states before new session calibration. PageRank-based ROI selection achieved an AUC of 73.5 +/- 7.9%, compared with 64.5 +/- 10.6% using all ROIs, while reducing computational time by approximately 39% relative to performance-driven selection. The proposed framework provides interpretable, compact descriptions of avalanche propagation and exploits training-related changes for prospective decoding. Moving spatial selection and model optimization to an initial offline phase may reduce subsequent calibration demands and facilitate more autonomous BCI use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mannino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: