Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Brilliant Green (BG)-contaminated wastewater threatens aquatic ecosystems by limiting light penetration, disrupting photosynthesis, and exposing organisms to potentially toxic compounds, raising broader environmental and human-health concerns. This study presents an explainable machine-learning framework for predicting BG removal during CaTiO 3 -assisted photocatalytic water treatment. Using 63 published experimental observations for the 2:7 precursor composition, six regression models Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and CatBoost were evaluated through Bayesian hyperparameter optimization and repeated cross-validation. Although Extra Trees achieved marginally higher holdout accuracy, CatBoost was selected for its superior repeated-validation performance, achieving a test R 2 of 0.9884, RMSE of 3.4629 percentage points, and mean cross-validation R 2 of 0.9697. SHAP analysis identified degradation time (60.57%), initial BG concentration (32.12%), and catalyst dosage (7.31%) as the principal contributors to model predictions. Feature-combination analysis reinforced this hierarchy, while CatBoost retained a test R 2 of 0.9778 under 10% Gaussian noise. Predicted BG removal (89.32%) closely matched the reported experimental value (88.46%). These findings provide a promising foundation for future experimental validation, broader catalyst screening, and interpretable optimization of photocatalytic wastewater treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: