Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compute isotropic-equivalent radio energies for six well-documented fast radio bursts (FRBs) with spectroscopic host-galaxy redshifts — the repeaters FRB 20121102A, FRB 20180916B and FRB 20190520B, and the apparently non-repeating FRB 20180924B, FRB 20190102C and FRB 20190608B — using published fluences and a single stated bandwidth convention of 400 MHz. The resulting energies span 3.55 × 10^37 erg to 1.84 × 10^40 erg, a factor of 519, with the apparently non-repeating bursts occupying the high-energy end of this small sample. Combining the volumetric rate of Shin et al. (2023), 7.3 × 10^4 Gpc^-3 yr^-1 above 10^39 erg, with the mean energy of their Schechter energy distribution above that threshold, 2.34 × 10^40 erg, gives a volumetric radio energy generation rate of 1.70 × 10^45 erg Gpc^-3 yr^-1. This is 2.4 × 10^-11 of the core-collapse supernova kinetic power density and 1.5 × 10^-6 of the rate at which magnetic energy is created in newborn magnetars with internal fields of 10^15 G. In radio emission alone the FRB population is therefore an energetically negligible draw on every known reservoir; the budget becomes restrictive only when a low radio efficiency is imposed. For the repeaters, a 10^4 yr active life at duty-corrected observed burst rates costs FRB 20121102A 4.32 × 10^46 erg in isotropic-equivalent radio energy, 26% of the total magnetic energy of a magnetar with a 10^15 G internal field and 0.26% for a 10^16 G internal field. Beaming is treated throughout as an explicit correction, stated separately and never folded into the quoted energies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: