Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A widely held belief at small markets is that adding more ice to a cold box always increases the value that can be sold that day: colder, on this view, is safer. This paper shows by computation that the belief does not survive for tropical produce. Tropical crops are injured by cold itself, below crop-specific thresholds, and injury grows with depth below the threshold and time spent there. Using a stated model for a 20 kg load traded for 8 hours at 32 °C ambient, with interior temperature falling as the ice ratio r — ice mass divided by produce mass — rises, the paper computes heat loss, chilling injury, ice cost and net saleable value for banana, mango, papaya, avocado and, as a temperate control, lettuce. Banana reaches its best net value of $20.51 at r = 0.21, enters chilling conditions at r = 0.322, and at r = 1.0 retains only $1.73, a fall of 91.6% from its grid optimum. Mango peaks at $54.49 at r = 0.35 and falls to $25.00 at r = 1.0. Lettuce, with no chilling threshold above 0 °C in the model, loses only 8.6% between its grid optimum and r = 1.0, mainly through ice cost. The ice fraction above which added ice reduces value is therefore stated for each crop. All results are computed from stated assumptions. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: