Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Description of the Research Data Workbook File: Agentic_AI_Case_Study_Dataset.xlsx Companion to: “Delegated Agency Across the Venture Cycle: The Bright and Dark Sides of Agentic AI in Entrepreneurial Ventures” (JEEE Special Issue submission) Compiled: 10 November 2026 Purpose The workbook is the complete replication dataset for the study’s comparative multiple-case analysis of seven agentic-AI ventures. Every descriptive figure reported in Section 4 of the manuscript is computed directly from this file, either through built-in formulas or via the accompanying replication script. Sheet-by-sheet contents Sheet Contents Cover Study metadata: design, observation window (Jan 2022 – Nov 2026), search period (28 Oct – 10 Nov 2026), corpus size (35 documents), screening totals, coding reliability, and the evidence-tier definitions. Case_Inventory Profiles of the seven included cases (Cognition/Devin, Harvey, Sierra, 11x, Rabbit, Adept, Vambe): HQ, founding year, venture-cycle stage, agentic offering, reported funding and valuation, key documented outcome facts, and source name/URL for every figure. Screening_Log All 27 screened candidates with the inclusion/exclusion/borderline decision, the primary reason, and an evidence-sufficiency rating — the audit trail behind Appendix B of the manuscript. Evidence_Log The full 35-document corpus: issuer, date, source type, evidence tier (A–D), the specific claim or event captured, and URL for each item. Coding_Matrix The case-by-code matrix: six agentic features (F1–F6), human-oversight level, five bright-side and six dark-side mechanism codes, outcome type, and venture status. Feature-count and dark-code-count cells are live formulas. CrossCase_Summary Formula-driven descriptive summaries reproducing the manuscript’s Section 4 tables (corpus composition by tier, cases by venture-cycle stage, feature prevalence, oversight vs dark-side codes, mechanism frequencies), with three embedded charts. All counts recalculate automatically if the coding matrix is edited. Search_Log The seven documented searches (S1–S7): platform, date, query string, filters, and records identified/screened/full-text assessed, with formula totals (214 / 96 / 58). How it connects to the replication code The plain-text replication file contains a Python script that reads this workbook and prints every Section 4 table (screening outcome, tier composition, stage distribution, feature prevalence, mechanism frequencies, and the oversight gradient). No figure in the manuscript is hard-coded; all derive from the Evidence_Log and Coding_Matrix sheets. Data-integrity note All funding, valuation, revenue and outcome figures are transcribed from the public sources listed in each row, with access date 10 November 2026. Company-reported figures (Tier C) and analyst aggregations (Tier D) are labelled as such and are not treated as independently verified facts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Job Agba Opue (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: