Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Development of a cost-effective Bladder-Prostate Phantom model to simulate the effects of minimally invasive surgical treatments (MIST) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and its validation by pressure-flow studyAbstractWe developed and bench-tested an economical bladder-prostate training construct to simulate bladder outlet obstruction and its relief during non-thermal minimally invasive interventions. The aim was to create a simple, locally fabricable platform to practise urethral implantation and quantify its urodynamic effects. The system combined a paediatric silicone AmbuBag (≈500 mL, wall thickness 3.6 mm, Shore 78 Sh0) as a compressible reservoir, a funnel-shaped neck, a collapsible silicone urethral tube (internal diameter 10 mm, wall thickness 0.95 mm, Shore 65 Sh0), and polyurethane foam balls (Shore 25 Sh00) to represent prostatic lobes compressing a 5-cm urethral segment. Using a multichannel urodynamic device, we recorded pressure-flow parameters in three configurations: obstruction alone, obstruction with an intraurethral coil-spring implant, and obstruction with a traction implant. Under obstruction, an infusion rate of 75 mL/min yielded a voided volume of 351 mL, an end-fill pressure of 8 cm H₂O, an opening detrusor pressure of 35 cm H₂O, a peak flow (Qmax) of 7.6 mL/s, a PdetQmax (detrusor pressure at peak flow) of 102 cm H₂O, and a bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) of 87.0, consistent with severe outflow resistance. With the coil-spring implant, peak flow increased to 31.8 mL/s, with PdetQmax reduced to 11 cm H₂O and the maximum detrusor pressure to 78 cm H₂O. With the traction implant, peak flow increased again to 36.7 mL/s, with an opening pressure of 84 cm H₂O, a PdetQmax of 14 cm H₂O, and a maximum detrusor pressure of 109 cm H₂O. These changes demonstrate improved pressure-flow performance, supporting this construct as a practical platform for device testing and skills training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakraborty et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: