Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dryland farmers lose crops to short dry spells, and biochar, synthetic hydrogels, bentonite clay and compost are all sold as water-holding fixes with no common price tag. This paper builds one computed yardstick - litres of additional plant-available water delivered in the root zone per dollar spent per hectare over the amendment's working life - and runs six options (three biochar classes, synthetic hydrogel, bentonite, compost) through it on sand, loam and clay, with break-even rainfall deficits against a maize water value. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED: all figures are outputs of the accompanying computation. On sand, bentonite ranks first (2,931.4 L/$) and low-temperature wood biochar second (2,687.1 L/$). Synthetic hydrogel collapses: 1,050 L/ha per fill (0.10 mm), 13.2 L/$, 222.1 times less than the best option. Only bentonite and low-temperature wood biochar on sand ever pay for maize on water alone, at break-even deficits of 19.4 and 16.7 mm/yr.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: