Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study aims to develop a dynamic, process-oriented understanding of how intergenerational succession reshapes innovation-related decisions and outcomes in family firms. Although previous reviews have examined family-firm innovation and the succession–innovation intersection, the evidence remains fragmented across theoretical perspectives, disciplinary communities, levels of analysis and stages of succession. Design/methodology/approach This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 246 publications covering the period 2005–2025 in the Web of Science Core Collection. By integrating co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence mapping, and temporal evolution analysis, we map the field’s intellectual structure and its thematic development over time. Findings The analysis reveals a cumulative yet increasingly differentiated knowledge structure. Family-centred behavioural and governance logics, particularly socioemotional wealth (SEW), provide the field’s theoretical foundation; knowledge transfer, resource recombination and dynamic capabilities explain organisational renewal during succession; and institutional, internationalisation and sustainability conditions shape its strategic direction. The temporal analysis further identifies a progression from conceptual consolidation, through strategic and organisational diversification, to increasingly specialised capability and decision mechanisms, supporting a process-oriented understanding of succession-related innovation. Originality/value By synthesising this trajectory, the study integrates a fragmented literature and clarifies how family-centred logics, processual mechanisms, and contextual conditions jointly shape innovation during intergenerational succession.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: