Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Spesolimab is an anti-interleukin-36 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). We report on (re)treatment of GPP flares with intravenous (IV) spesolimab in patients receiving long-term subcutaneous (SC) spesolimab in EFFISAYIL ON. The objectives were to (1) investigate long-term efficacy of SC spesolimab for flare prevention in the EFFISAYIL ON study, in which over 100 patients with GPP have received SC spesolimab for up to 5 years and (2) describe the efficacy and safety of IV spesolimab in patients with a high burden of GPP, who have experienced a flare while receiving long-term SC spesolimab in EFFISAYIL ON. Methods: EFFISAYIL ON (NCT03886246) is an ongoing 5-year extension of the EFFISAYIL 1 and EFFISAYIL 2 trials. Patients received SC spesolimab (300 mg every 4, 6, or 12 weeks; dose escalation and de-escalation for flare recurrence/resolution allowed per protocol) for up to 252 weeks. In case of a protocol-defined GPP flare, patients received IV spesolimab 900 mg (≤2 doses within 1 week). Results: Of 131 patients enrolled from the parent trials, 21 (16.0%) received IV spesolimab to treat a total of 36 flare events (single dose, n=29; double dose, n=7). IV spesolimab demonstrated rapid control of flares: GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) pustulation subscore of 0 in 50.0% (n=18) of flare treatments at Week 1 and 58.3% (n=21) at Week 2; GPPGA total score of 0/1 in 41.7% (n=15) at Week 1 and 55.6% (n=20) at Week 2. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of spesolimab. Conclusion: Sustained efficacy was observed in most patients treated with SC spesolimab for GPP flare prevention; for those who did experience flares, preliminary results from EFFISAYIL ON demonstrate that IV spesolimab is an effective and well-tolerated treatment. These findings support the complementary roles of IV and SC spesolimab in the long-term management of GPP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: