Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A waterproof garment that does not transmit water vapour keeps rain out by sealing the wearer in, and the wearer's own sweat then becomes the water problem. This paper derives a work-rate bound for that trade. Metabolic heat is computed from metabolic rate at 20% mechanical efficiency, a stated dry heat loss of 80 W is subtracted, and the remainder must be removed by evaporation at a latent heat of 2430 J/g. Each garment class is assigned a stated moisture vapour transmission rate over a covered area of 1.6 m2, giving a transmission capacity in grams per hour; sweat produced above that capacity is counted as internal accumulation. The activity ceiling — the metabolic rate at which required evaporation exactly equals transmission capacity — is 100.0 W for a sealed plastic garment (transmission 0 g/h), 167.5 W for oiled cotton (80.0 g/h), and 662.5 W for a standard breathable membrane (666.7 g/h). Ordinary work lies far above the first two ceilings: at 300 W a sealed garment accumulates 237.0 g/h of internal water and oiled cotton 157.0 g/h, while the membrane accumulates none. Above the ceiling the un-evaporated heat is stored in the body; at 400 W a sealed garment reaches a 1.5 K core-temperature rise in 27.1 minutes. Compared with the rain itself, a sealed garment in light rain at 2 mm/h makes its wearer wetter from sweat than the rain would have done above 160.7 W, and in moderate rain at 7.5 mm/h above 327.8 W; in heavy rain at 25 mm/h the crossover is at 859.4 W, outside any sustainable work rate, so there the seal still wins on wetness alone. The bound is an energy and mass balance, not a comfort prediction, and its most direct use is negative: below the stated ceilings is the only region in which a sealed garment can be worn for sustained work without the wearer supplying the water that wets them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: