Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study explores youth participation in climate diplomacy, focusing on barriers, regional disparities, and policy outcomes. Using a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, the research integrates qualitative and quantitative methods, including interviews, focus groups, surveys, and document analysis. Data were collected from 50 interviews, 5 focus groups, and surveys distributed to 100 youth delegates who participated in COP26–COP28. Observations during COP28 and key policy documents further enriched the analysis. Findings reveal significant financial constraints as a major barrier, particularly for participants from Africa and South America, where 80% relied on external funding. The concept of “youth-washing” emerged, with many participants reporting symbolic inclusion without real influence. Regional disparities were evident, as Europe and Asia demonstrated higher institutional access compared to resource-constrained regions in the Global South. Despite these challenges, youth advocacy achieved notable successes, including the inclusion of intergenerational equity in the Glasgow Climate Pact. The study recommends addressing structural barriers through targeted funding for Global South youth and establishing youth advisory councils within global climate bodies. These measures will ensure more inclusive and meaningful youth participation, advancing equitable climate governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chinazaekpere Ofodile (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: