Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) exhibits heterogeneous clinical outcomes, and limited biomarkers are available to predict response to targeted therapies. This study evaluated cell compartment-specific transcriptional biomarkers predicting clinical response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib. In this phase 2 clinical trial (NCT00715442), 46 patients with metastatic ccRCC received sunitinib pre- and post-cytoreductive nephrectomy, with a primary endpoint of time-to-progression (TTP) and secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and sunitinib toxicity. To investigate spatial dynamics of therapeutic response to sunitinib, we applied whole-transcriptome digital spatial profiling (DSP) to tumor tissue from responders and non-responders. For 46 trial patients, median TTP was 8.2 months (95% CI: 6.1–19.3) and OS 36.3 months (95% CI: 19.7–70.5). Responders displayed a tumor microenvironment enriched in pro-inflammatory/immunostimulatory programs, while non-responders displayed enrichment of immunosuppressive programs with elevated PD-L1 expression in myeloid cells and exhausted CD8 + T-cell signatures. Sunitinib resistance mechanisms involving VEGF-dependent and independent angiogenic pathways were identified, revealing potential therapeutic targets. DSP-based machine learning models showed strong prognostic and predictive performance in sunitinib-treated patients in an external JAVELIN Renal 101 cohort, but attenuated performance in the avelumab plus axitinib cohort, indicating treatment-context specificity. Our findings highlight immune regulation as a key determinant of sunitinib response in metastatic ccRCC. Spatial profiling revealed potentially targetable mechanisms of TKI resistance involving SPP1-associated myeloid programs, CD8 + T-cell exhaustion, and angiogenic signaling, highlighting interactions between angiogenesis, lipid metabolism, and tumor immunity as determinants of therapeutic outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasanov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: