Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We prove exact monotonicity and unimodality properties of the Jonah saddle multipliers. The transverse multiplier λsλ_sλs is strictly increasing from −1-1−1 to 111 with derivative λs′=3(2t−1)(4t−1)/(2t4)λ_s' = 3(2t-1)(4t-1)/(2t^4)λs′=3(2t−1)(4t−1)/(2t4). The longitudinal multiplier λuλ_uλu is unimodal with unique maximum (17+77)/27≈1.3156(17+7√7)/27 ≈ 1.3156(17+77)/27≈1.3156 at t=(7+7)/14t = (7+√7)/14t=(7+7)/14. The spectral log-ratio S=ln(λu/∣λs∣)S = ln(λ_u/|λ_s|)S=ln(λu/∣λs∣) is strictly increasing on (1/2,t0)(1/2, t_0)(1/2,t0) and strictly decreasing on (t0,1)(t_0, 1)(t0,1), diverging to +∞+∞+∞ at t0=(3+3)/6t_0 = (3+√3)/6t0=(3+3)/6. This monotonicity rigorously excludes any local bifurcation (fold, transcritical, pitchfork, flip, or Neimark-Sacker) on the entire branch. We identify an area-preservation threshold tV≈0.6083t_V ≈ 0.6083tV≈0.6083 as the unique root in (1/2,1)(1/2, 1)(1/2,1) of an irreducible quintic, where ∣detDFt(Jt)∣=1| DF_t(J_t)| = 1∣detDFt(Jt)∣=1 and λs=−1/λuλ_s = -1/λ_uλs=−1/λu. The formula for λuλ_uλu is derived directly from the isosceles reduction, and both multiplier formulas are confirmed by exact computation of the characteristic polynomial of the full 3×33 × 33×3 Jacobian at 30 rational values of ttt. All results are exact and reproducible with the supplied Python code.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schloss Jonah (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: