Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This paper aims to develop a data-driven ergonomic chair design framework that improves multi-parameter chair design for user groups with heterogeneous anthropometric characteristics. Design/methodology/approach Large-scale anthropometric data from the Anthropometric Survey of US Army Personnel (ANSUR) II database are clustered using K-means to identify representative user prototypes. Prototype-specific ideal seat parameters are then de-rived according to ergonomic principles. To solve the resulting multi-prototype optimization problem, an improved genetic algorithm (IC2GA) is proposed by integrating a clearing mechanism and a crowding replacement strategy, enabling joint optimization of multiple chair parameters while preserving solution diversity. Findings The proposed method achieved a mean comfort score of 74.00 ± 0.02 across multiple independent repeated experiments, and showed a computational efficiency of 18.89 ± 8.41 s. Ablation analysis shows that introducing prototype identification increased the comfort score from 64.96 ± 0.49 to 73.46 ± 0.06, indicating that modelling user diversity was the primary reason for the performance improvement. Prototype matching analysis further demonstrates that the mean own-other difference is 21.38, confirming that continuous improvement at the individual level is stable. Research limitations/implications This assessment is primarily based on simulation studies and focuses on adult anthropometric data, static sitting postures, and a limited set of geometric parameters. Therefore, further validation through physical experiments and a broader sample population is still required. Originality/value This study integrates user prototype recognition, prototype-specific parameter mapping, and an improved clearing-crowding genetic algorithm into a unified framework for the parametric design of ergonomic chairs. It provides both a refined multi-prototype modelling strategy and an optimization method that maintains diversity across different body types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: