Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A split tally records a quantity as notches cut across a stick that is then split lengthwise, so that each party keeps a half bearing the same notches. This paper models that device as a produce cooperative's deposit record and gives it a working procedure. On a stick with 280 mm of usable length, a single row of unit notches at 4 mm spacing holds 70 notches; the zoned denomination scheme proposed here, units at 5 mm spacing in a 100 mm zone, tens at 9 mm in a 90 mm zone, and hundreds at 18 mm in a 90 mm zone, represents any quantity up to 599 kg, or 599.5 kg with a half-unit notch, at a resolution of 0.5 kg. One-sided alteration is the tally's strength: a notch added to one half only is always exposed when the halves are fitted together, giving a detection probability of 1.0 under the stated rule that halves are always compared, whereas a single written figure in one book carries a stated undetected-alteration probability of 0.01 per record, worth an expected 20.0 kg per year over 400 records at an assumed 5 kg per alteration. Joint fitting also reduces reading error: the probability of miscounting at least one zone falls from 1.49 percent for a half read alone to 0.15 percent when both halves are counted together, or from 5.97 expected miscounts in 400 settlements to 0.6. The cost of settling small disagreements without a dispute is a tolerance, and its price is stated plainly: settling on the lower figure whenever the halves differ by at most 1 kg can hide at most 400 kg per year over 400 settlements, which is 1.67 percent of a throughput of 24000 kg, in the worst case where every difference favours the same party. All results are simulated, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: