Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Central kitchens that cook school meals for several schools must move the perishable components — here, a 250 mL milk carton and a 150 g cooked protein portion for each of 60 children, 24.0 kg in total — to a school and hold them safely until they are served, often without refrigeration at the school or in the vehicle. This paper sizes a passive box for that journey: scheduled at 6 hours (1.5 hours of transport and 4.5 hours of waiting) at a 32 °C ambient, with the load held at or below a safe temperature of 5 °C throughout, and sized against an 8-hour design target so that ordinary delays have margin. The design is a box of internal dimensions 0.60 × 0.40 × 0.40 m insulated with 40 mm of expanded polystyrene (U = 0.90 W/m²/K) and carrying 6 kg of phase-change material (PCM) melting at 2 °C with a latent heat of 230 kJ/kg, frozen overnight to −6 °C. A transient lumped enthalpy model holds the load at 2.0 °C through 8 hours, completes melting at 8.87 hours, and does not cross 5 °C until 11.20 hours; the identical box without PCM crosses 5 °C at 1.32 hours. Overnight re-freezing of the PCM requires 1,518.6 kJ (0.422 kWh) of cooling per box in the worst case, or 3.80 kWh of cooling and 2.37 kWh of electricity per night for a nine-box fleet serving 500 children, which two 250 W chest freezers deliver in 7.59 hours but one freezer cannot deliver in an overnight window (15.19 hours). The system costs $293 in capital per box and $68.71 per box per year in total, or $1.15 per child per year ($0.0064 per child per meal) over 180 school days. The failures are as important as the headline: PCM dispatched only half re-frozen crosses 5 °C at 6.53 hours, and at 5.49 hours on a 38 °C day — before a delayed service is complete — and a box whose PCM is half frozen and which is opened 30 times crosses at 4.97 hours, inside the scheduled journey itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: