Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A four-step drawdown protocol using a US$52 airline-gauge kit recovers the Jacob coefficients of a stated village well (B = 1.8 m per (L/s), C = 0.9 m per (L/s)^2) and supports a pre-stated pass/fail rule giving a sustainable rate of 1.33 L/s; a stated 1.5 L/s demand fails on efficiency (57%) despite passing on drawdown. A Monte Carlo error budget gives standard deviations of 0.21 on B and 0.22 on C, correlated at -0.90, a sustainable-rate uncertainty of 0.35 L/s, and a C resolution limit of 0.040 m per (L/s)^2 with a carefully read gauge. Two wells with opposite failures, identical at any single pumping rate, differ by 37 standard deviations at the top step. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: