Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A companion evaluation bounded a fifth-coordinate coupling to optical clock rates: with nu(chi) = nu0[1 + kappa5(chi - chi0)] and a spatial gradient gamma, null clock comparisons at the 1e-18 level bound |kappa5 gamma| < 1e-18 per metre. That coupling and bound are taken as given input. This paper prices the same coupling in the atom-interferometry channel at saturation of the clock bound, under two explicit readings. Under the universal (metric) reading the gradient is a uniform extra acceleration a5 = c^2 kappa5 gamma = 8.99e-2 m/s^2. A state-of-the-art atom gravimeter (5.5e-8 g at 1 s) excludes saturation by 5.2 orders of magnitude (predicted phase 3.62e3 rad against 2.17e-2 rad phase noise), bounding |kappa5 gamma| < 6.0e-24 per metre; the per-interferometer readout of a 10 m fountain gradiometer excludes it by 6.4 orders, while its ideal differential gravity-gradient readout predicts exactly zero for a uniform acceleration; a space-borne STE-QUEST-type design excludes it by 10.5 orders per cycle. Under the clock-transit reading, the differential phase of the 100 m MAGIS-100 strontium clock gradiometer is 9.0e-8 rad, 2.0 orders of magnitude below its 1e-5 rad design phase-stability scale (4.0 orders below a conservative 1e-3 rad level): a negative result, printed at full size, with the coupling unadjusted. AI-use disclosure: an AI assistant, Dave, assisted in the preparation of this work, including computation and drafting, under the direction of the author.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: